MDL FINTECH

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

A thesis and a trade setup are not the same thing.

MDL separates market direction from trade timing and requires multiple layers of evidence before a setup is treated as actionable research.

Public trust & transparency information · Updated 19 September 2026

Multi-timeframe research framework

H4 — Context

Higher-timeframe regime, structure, support/resistance and areas of interest.

H1 — Directional thesis

Primary directional and reversal authority, structural change and thesis validity.

M30 — Early watch

Development layer used to observe whether a potential setup is forming.

M15 — Primary timing

Main setup and entry-timing layer for structure, retest and confirmation evidence.

M5 — Fresh evidence

Lower-timeframe telemetry and fresh trigger evidence rather than a standalone directional authority.

M1 — Safety

Short-term safety filtering intended to detect conditions that may make immediate execution unattractive.

Direction thesis vs. trade setup

A market can have a valid directional thesis without having a valid trade setup at the current moment. MDL treats these as separate research questions so direction alone does not become a blind entry instruction.

Confirmation, invalidation and expiry

MDL research states can remain under observation, become confirmed, be invalidated or expire as conditions change. The exact internal thresholds and proprietary research rules are not published in full, and they may evolve as new evidence is validated.

Evidence standard

MDL's research process is designed to keep weak results, rejected hypotheses and invalidated setups visible to the research process instead of measuring only favourable outcomes.

Methodology describes how MDL studies markets. It is not a guarantee that a market will move as expected or that any setup will be profitable.